Limited Liability Policy - PhotoBlocker™
PhotoBlocker™ makes no representation or warranty regarding the effectiveness of this product. Results may vary upon application and duration of time the product is on a license plate. PhotoBlocker™ and re-sellers accept no liability or responsibility for any events resulting, or not resulting, from the use of this product.
ALL SALES ARE FINAL. THE RESPONSIBILITY AND RESULTS OF USING THIS PRODUCT REMAINS SOLEY AND ENTIRELY WITH THE PURCHASER AND/OR USER. LAWS REGARDING THE USE OF THIS PRODUCT MAY VARY BETWEEN STATES AND COUNTRIES.
NOTE : IN SOME STATES IT IS UNLAWFUL TO DISPLAY ON ANY VEHICLE A REGISTRATION PLATE WHICH IS OBSCURED IN ANY MANNER WHICH INHIBITS THE PROPER OPERATION OF AN AUTOMATED RED LIGHT ENFORCEMENT SYSTEM. PRODUCTS SOLD AS NOVELTY ITEM ONLY. NOT FOR USE ON PUBLIC ROADS OR WHERE LOCAL LAWS PROHIBIT. CHECK LOCAL MOTOR VEHICLE LAWS BEFORE USING PRODUCTS! The best way to avoid red light camera, speed camera or toll violation tickets is to not run relights, speed and or not pay toll fees.
Dick Army, U.S. House Majority Leader
Here is a verifiable quote and context from former U.S. House Majority Leader Dick Armey regarding red-light cameras and revenue:
Direct Quote (Dick Armey)
From a 2001 report and statements attributed to his office:
“The only benefit to having the cameras is to fill the pocketbook of local governments.”
Supporting Statement (Same context)
Armey also argued that:
Red-light cameras “can be rigged… to yield more revenue from fines.”
Additional Context
- Armey criticized red-light cameras as:
- A “cash cow” for governments
- A system that generated millions in fines
- His report characterized the program as prioritizing revenue over safety
Summary (Plain English)
Dick Armey’s position was clear:
He believed red-light cameras were being used primarily as revenue-generating tools, not safety tools.